The Internet penetration for Canada is 84%% The landing page bounce rate for site A is 44%. Is the bounce rate for site A unacceptably high? Your opinion is heavily swayed by the previous fact, whether you’re conscious of it or not. The tendency of humans to anchor and adjust is insidious. Even if you hear a number that has nothing to do with the question in question, it’s going to color future perceptions. Why am I so concerned about this? Consider how it can impact business decisions: If people get it into their heads that 40 cents is a really good CPC based on some previous campaign – that becomes the anchor. Then, suddenly, a 4 dollar keyword looks[…]
Screw pageviews. Pageviews are to 2009 as “Hits” are to 1997. Pageviews are so simple to understand. It says, “Page” and “Views”. It must mean “it’s the number of pages that were viewed on the website”. And it’s so scalable too! I mean, somebody can ask me, “How many pageviews did this page get”, and you can tell them, and people will say, ‘okay’. It’s a directional number. Sort of like how ‘hits’ were back in the day. And in a soundbyte world, easy wins. It’s not all easy though. It’s easy to interpret a number the way you want to. Sometimes, people will misinterpret ‘pageviews’ to mean ‘people’ – just as people (I verbally slip from time to time)[…]
“Some Definitions Satisfaction is usually measured as the self-report of a transient attitude based on a recent experience. Even if one is asked about one’s overall satisfaction, this response is almost perfectly correlated with the satisfaction rating of the most recent experience. ASat tells you a little bit about what’s in the consumer’s head but not much about what they’ll do in the future. Another key metric used is loyalty. Loyalty is often defined as repeat purchases. This is a step in the right direction. Now we are examining behaviors which are more likely to predict future behaviors than attitudes. However, for big-ticket items or items purchased occasionally, measures of repeat purchases are inadequate as there are insufficient data points[…]
Business questions shift over time. It’s the great Delta. There are very specific questions that can have an immense impact on the business if they were answered and executed against. These include: “How many [repeat] customers do I have?”“Who are my most valuable customers?”“What do my most valuable customers have in common?”“Who are my least valuable customers?”“How much is it costing me to service my least valuable customers?”“How do I attract more customers like my most valuable ones?”“Who should I direct discounts at? When?”“Who should I direct ‘I love you’ campaigns at? When?”“Who should I just stop saying anything to? When?”“How are customers finding my site?”“What channels are resulting in highest conversion?”“How are returning customers finding my site?”“Where are they[…]
Toronto is a very interesting place right now. There’s an energy here, roiling away at the lower level. I’m hearing good things coming out of the data mining community. I’m hearing good things at MaRS, and a few interesting web analytics projects that are emerging around pub tables across the downtown core. There are developers, statisticians, search professionals, ecommerce directors, data miners, entrepreuneurs, social scientists and hard scientists – working away on different implementations, on different levels, in different sectors. It’s hard for me to know what’s happening in the other analytical capitals – Hong Kong, London, San Fran, and the New York – Baltimore – Washington corridor. But it’s finally happening here.
Do you know a restaurant owner? I have an analytical optimization idea, and I need a case study to prove it. The best thing you can ever do is to work on real data and measure real results. If you could throw me an email: cberry.blog@gmail.com if you know one, that would help a lot. Thanks!
An example of a copy analytics questions is: which call to action works better? “Buy now!” “Learn more…” The answer, maddeningly, is: “it depends”. That’s why we have a methodology for testing. It’s the scientific method. Just because we have Google Website Optimizer that can, in theory, answer that question very easily, that doesn’t mean that we throw away the scientific method altogether. Just because it’s so easy – that doesn’t mean that we should be sloppy, either. For instance, let’s assume that you have direct ability to go in and edit your HTML with the Google Website Optimizer code. Assume that you can do this yourself, and you have the know-how. Also assume that you’re disciplined enough to keep[…]
Jim Novo asks: Are you are Marketer, or are you really just all about Advertising? You should read it. Go on, I’ll wait. I’m a marketer. Marketing involves examining the lifecycle and being really smart about it. There’s so much hype over this white whale called “CRM”, and it’s to the point where I don’t even want to call it CRM anymore. I’d much rather call it lifecycle management or lifecycle optimization or lifecycle hummingbird than call it CRM. Novo’s pioneering work around lifecycle management – doing it in a spreadsheet, was really inspiring. Most businesses don’t have more than 65000 customers and 256 pieces of data on them. I took some of his techniques and applied them to SPSS[…]
Dave Hamel, friend of the show, wrote: “The problem arises when a company or product has no differentiating feature. If your product is producing websites, then you’re screwed. Sorry but you’re totally hosed because there are lots of places that produce websites. There is a library of software that can produce websites. There is an army of developers in India who will create exactly what they are told. Many digital marketing agencies are just that, website producers. They may talk about being innovative, and cutting edge but they’re not. Innovation takes risk and “cutting edge” cuts both ways. They have a profit margin to meet or angry share-holders to deal with.” And he makes valid points. It’s all about profit.[…]
In response to the post on The Productivity Trilemma, Maciek went replied with another, focusing on Productivity, Niches, and Aesthetes. Maciek’s first point – that most people associate gains in productivity as a deliberately cheapening of the inputs, resulting in a crappy, cheap output, is quite apt. Any trip to a big box retail outlet will confirm that link for you. And that sort of productivity gain is just fine if you’re in a race to the bottom. The implicit assumption running through Maciek’s post, I’m happy to say, is a race to the top. How does one go about producing artisan products, of high quality, for niche markets, in a manner that is highly productive? This culminates in the[…]