Reddit banned linking to The Atlantic and Physorg, among others, in an effort to fight spam. (You can read more about the specifics here.) Is banning an admission that the voting algorithm is broken? This is a huge issue in social right now. Let me explain: If you’re a publisher of niche content, in particular, content that appeals to males 18-34, you can ill afford to ignore Reddit. Reddit directs a lot of traffic to other websites. There’s a monetary incentive to rig the system. Everybody gets an equal vote on Reddit. It’s a very democratic voting system. Democracies spawn interest groups. On Reddit, groups of people can form voting rings. If you want to get your link to the[…]
There are two great stacks in modern analytics: the technology stack and the social stack. The technology stack includes all the tools you’re going to invest in to shape the experiences you (and your team) will have. The social stack includes all the tools and people you’re going to invest in to shape the experiences you (and your team) will have. Constructing both stacks have benefits and drawbacks. They always have consequences and always carry diseases with them. They are always subject to their own peculiar form of lock-in that’s far more resistant to change than you might suspect. The good people at Keplar LLC have put together a neat take on the web analytics stack. Quoting from them: “What[…]
The design pattern phrase: “__________ for people like you” Is powerful and elegant. Behold: “The Unemployment Rate For People Like You“ Clicky Clicky. It’s worth it. *** I’m Christopher Berry.I tweet about analytics @cjpberryI write at christopherberry.ca
What influences your customers to buy? We watched last week as, again, the attribution debate come back to the surface. (You can read a five part series on the subject from April 2012.) First-click attribution to time-decay attribution to last-click attribution to algorithmic smoothing, OH MY! All of them are techniques to assign value to something that happened, and, that has uses. All models have their uses, and all models, by definition, are too small to fit all the complexity. Understand the uses and use them to set expectations that make sense in that context. That aside, a set of independent variables in the attribution debate that may be more predictive are the actual influences on customer purchase. In your[…]
Microsoft was going to ship Internet Explorer 10 with Do Not Track turned on by default. The industry reacted negatively. As a result, IE 10 will not ship with Do Not Track turned on by default. The key principle is: “An ordinary user agent MUST NOT send a Tracking Preference signal without a user’s explicit consent.” Argument If a browser is sending out a do not track signal by default, it is argued, then the signal becomes meaningless and will be disregarded, as the user didn’t actually opt out of tracking. They didn’t make that choice. Why isn’t Do Not Track turned on by default? The HTTP cookie has been turned on by default since 1994, when Lou, an engineer[…]
The Data Journalism handbook from O’Reilly is good stuff. The rise of data journalism is really great news. I’m seeing great things in Toronto. Like this piece. And this piece. And this piece. Granted, some of it is good old fashioned access to information investigative journalism. The sophistication of the analysis has increased. So has the sophistication of their mediums. There’s a lot that digital analytics practitioners can learn from journalism. Journalists have several hundred years on all of us in terms of communicating with the public. They have to write popular things to stay in business. They’re master framers of public opinion. There’s a lot to be learned there. Journalists don’t communicate in excel or powerpoint. Their mediums are[…]
Fisher and Pry put forth “A Simple Substitution Model of Technological Change” in 1971 (Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3, 75-88). (The paper is not publicly available, for free, at the time I wrote this post.) It could be useful in explaining the gap left behind by Bass, and the downsides of all the charts I showed Monday. I like this paper. Here’s the first paragraph: “For people who attempt to forecast the future, there is a continuing need for simple models that describe the course of unfolding events. Each such model should be based upon easily understood assumptions that are not available for unconscious or invisible tampering by the forecaster in his efforts to make the future what he[…]
Henry Blodget wrote a pretty good piece about the TV business, comparing it to the collapse of newspapers. It’s well worth the read. TL;DR: Newspaper executives were skeptical about the threat that The Internet posed to their business model Revenue collapsed far faster than they expected Network TV is increasingly irrelevant in a DVR-shifting and omni-channel streaming world “The vast majority of money TV advertisers spend to reach our household (~$750 a year, ~$60/month) is wasted, because we rarely watch TV content with ads, and, when we do, we rarely watch the ads.” Human behavior is changing fast What surprised me? Just how precipitous the collapse in newspaper advertising was. The importance of newspapers in facilitating local commerce – in[…]
The Bass Diffusion Model not only works for what happens inside a social network, but also applies for the adoption of the network itself. Two weeks ago you read about the rise of Pinterest, and, followed up with a piece on the primacy of Facebook in America. In short, Pinterest is scaling successfully, and in my judgement, much better than Twitter did comparatively in 2008. Facebook, to most Americans, is synonymous with social networking, and, their experience is largely positive. Last week you read about the Bass Diffusion model. Innovators adopt. If they’re impressed, word of mouth takes hold and the imitators follow suit. The effect can be modeled, understood, and predicted.The diffusion of social network platforms (software as a[…]
With few exceptions, everybody has a personal knowledge system. I use the term as Roger Martin meant it in “The Opposable Mind” (pp. 103). It’s all summed up in one nice little diagram. Behold: The text summary is: Your stance, “Who am I in the word and what am I trying to accomplish”, guides what tools you use. That is, “With what tools and models do I organize my thinking and understand the world?”, often guides experiences: “With what experiences can I build my repertoire of sensitivities and skills?”. Likewise, your experiences inform your tools which inform your stance. Tools I’ve railed against definition by tools. Again. Again. And Again. You are more than the sum of the tools and[…]